Compare

Flawsnap vs Marker.io

Both help teams collect bug reports with screenshots. Here's how they differ on price and features, side by side, so you can pick the one that fits.

Flawsnap compared with Marker.io
FeatureFlawsnapMarker.io
Entry price$9/mo Starter, billed monthly ($19/mo Pro)$39/mo Starter billed annually, $59/mo billed monthly
Team membersUnlimited team members3 members on Starter (more cost extra)
Try it7-day free trial, card required15-day free trial, no card
Website report buttonYes, one script tagYes
Browser extensionChrome, Edge and Brave (Chrome Web Store)Chrome, Firefox, Edge
Console and network logsYes, on every planYes, from the Team plan ($149/mo annually)
Video / recordingsScreen recordings on ProSession replay, from the Team plan
Mobile app SDKFlutter SDK (iOS and Android), on every planReact Native SDK (beta, on request)
AI agents (MCP)Claude and ChatGPT connectors, MCP for coding agents (Pro)MCP server (Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor and others), from Starter

Competitor details as of , from their own pricing and help pages. Prices and features may have changed since; check their sites. Empty cells are things we couldn't confirm. Spot a mistake? Email [email protected] and we'll fix it.

Sources

Choose Marker.io if…

Agencies and larger teams who want deep Jira and Azure DevOps sync and session replay.

Choose Flawsnap if…

You're a small team that wants every report to carry the screenshot, console and network calls from $9 a month, with unlimited members; or you want reports, boards and docs in one place your AI agent can read.

Marker.io alternatives · All comparisons · Other comparisons: vs BugHerd · vs Userback · vs Jam · vs Usersnap · vs Gleap · vs Luciq (formerly Instabug) · vs Shake · vs Feedbucket · vs Ruttl · vs BetterBugs