Compare

Flawsnap vs Disbug

Both help teams collect bug reports with screenshots. Here's how they differ on price and features, side by side, so you can pick the one that fits.

Flawsnap compared with Disbug
FeatureFlawsnapDisbug
Entry price$9/mo Starter, billed monthly ($19/mo Pro)Free plan (1 member); Pro $16/mo billed yearly, $19 monthly
Team membersUnlimited team members1 on Free, 3 on Pro, 10 on Team; anonymous reporters free
Try it7-day free trial, card requiredFree plan, no credit card to start
Website report buttonYes, one script tagNot confirmed
Browser extensionChrome, Edge and Brave (Chrome Web Store)Chrome
Console and network logsYes, on every planConsole and network logs, on every plan incl. Free
Video / recordingsScreen recordings on ProSession replay, on every plan
Mobile app SDKFlutter SDK (iOS and Android), on every planNot confirmed
AI agents (MCP)Claude and ChatGPT connectors, MCP for coding agents (Pro)MCP and CLI for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and others, incl. Free

Competitor details as of , from their own pricing and help pages. Prices and features may have changed since; check their sites. Empty cells are things we couldn't confirm. Spot a mistake? Email [email protected] and we'll fix it.

Sources

Choose Disbug if…

Solo developers and small teams handing browser bugs straight to Claude Code, Codex or Cursor with full console and network context.

Choose Flawsnap if…

You're a small team that wants every report to carry the screenshot, console and network calls from $9 a month, with unlimited members; you ship a Flutter app as well as a website, with both on one board; or you want reports, boards and docs in one place your AI agent can read.

Disbug alternatives · All comparisons · Other comparisons: vs Marker.io · vs BugHerd · vs Userback · vs Jam · vs Usersnap · vs Gleap · vs Luciq (formerly Instabug) · vs Shake · vs Feedbucket · vs Ruttl · vs BetterBugs · vs MarkUp.io · vs Pastel · vs Atarim · vs Webvizio · vs zipBoard · vs Superflow · vs BugSmash · vs Doorbell.io · vs Bugsee · vs Sentry User Feedback